Showing posts with label SSL certificates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SSL certificates. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

SSL Certificate filename extensions

Original resource is here.

SSL has been around for long enough you'd think that there would be agreed upon container formats. And you're right, there are. Too many standards as it happens. So this is what I know, and I'm sure others will chime in.
  • .csr This is a Certificate Signing Request. Some applications can generate these for submission to certificate-authorities. It includes some/all of the key details of the requested certificate such as subject, organization, state, whatnot, as well as the public key of the certificate to get signed. These get signed by the CA and a certificate is returned. The returned certificate is the public certificate, which itself can be in a couple of formats.
  • .pem Defined in RFC's 1421 through 1424, this is a container format that may include just the public certificate (such as with Apache installs, and CA certificate files /etc/ssl/certs), or may include an entire certificate chain including public key, private key, and root certificates. The name is from Privacy Enhanced Email, a failed method for secure email but the container format it used lives on.
  • .key This is a PEM formatted file containing just the private-key of a specific certificate. In Apache installs, this frequently resides in /etc/ssl/private. The rights on this directory and the certificates is very important, and some programs will refuse to load these certificates if they are set wrong.
  • .pkcs12 .pfx .p12 Originally defined by RSA in the Public-Key Cryptography Standards, the "12" variant was enhanced by Microsoft. This is a passworded container format that contains both public and private certificate pairs. Unlike .pem files, this container is fully encrypted. Every time I get one I have to google to remember the openssl-fu required to break it into .key and .pem files.
A few other formats that show up from time to time:
  • .der A way to encode ASN.1 syntax, a .pem file is just a Base64 encoded .der file. OpenSSL can convert these to .pem. Windows sees these as Certificate files. I've only ever run into them in the wild with Novell's eDirectory certificate authority.
  • .cert .cer A .pem formatted file with a different extension, one that is recognized by Windows Explorer as a certificate, which .pem is not.
  • .crl A certificate revocation list. Certificate Authorities produce these as a way to de-authorize certificates before expiration.

In summary, there are three different ways to present certificates and their components:
  • PEM Governed by RFCs, it's used preferentially by open-source software. It can have a variety of extensions (.pem, .key, .cer, .cert, more)
  • PKCS12 A private standard that provides enhanced security versus the plain-text PEM format. It's used preferentially by Windows systems, and can be freely converted to PEM format through use of openssl.
  • DER The parent format of PEM. It's useful to think of it as a binary version of the base64-encoded PEM file. Not routinely used by anything in common usage.
More about certificates and cryptography can be found on wikipedia.

Monday, September 09, 2013

Using SSL certificates for VMware vSphere Components

Streaming the certificate replacement and management process in a VMware environment can be challenging at times. For instance, changing certificates for a vCenter 5.1 is a hugely laborious process. And in a typical environment where there are a large number of hosts running, tracking and managing their certificates is difficult and time consuming. More importantly, security breaches due to lapsed certificates can prove to be very expensive to the organization. vCert Manager from VSS Labs provides fully automated management of SSL Certificates in a VMware environment across the entire lifecycle.

VSS Labs has solution to simplify SSL management. For more info look at http://vsslabs.com/vCert.html

To be honest I had no chance to test it because I avoid signed SSL certificates if possible. However when I'll have a customer who requires SSL I definitely have to evaluate VSS Labs solution.